GobblesGobbles

Nasdaq's Top 10 Are Up 784% in a Year — More Than the Dot-Com Peak

4 min readPublishes daily5 sourcesAI-written, source-linked. Learn moreNot investment advice. Verify with a financial professional before acting.

The Nasdaq's top 10 performers in the Nasdaq 100 have gained an average of 784% over the past year — outpacing even the fevered gains that preceded the dot-com collapse in March 2000, according to BTIG's Jonathan Krinsky.


Nasdaq's Top 10 Are Up 784% in a Year — More Than the Dot-Com Peak

BTIG analyst Jonathan Krinsky flagged a striking data point: the top 10 performers in the Nasdaq 100 have averaged 784% gains over the past year, topping the 622% average recorded by the index's biggest winners in the year leading into the March 2000 peak. The numbers are nearly impossible to ignore for anyone who lived through what came next.

The immediate comparison is the dot-com bust — but several r/investing commenters pushed back on that framing. In 1999, many of the high-flyers were small companies that had never posted a profit, burning cash and trading at hundreds of times sales. Today's top performers are, for the most part, large companies reporting billions in earnings. "2000 was speculation about future profits. 2026 is pricing in existing ones," as one commenter put it. That distinction matters if the market corrects: companies with real earnings have a floor; companies without them often went to zero.

Still, the concentration and velocity of these gains have raised flags even among bulls. Whether today's earnings justify these multiples — or whether the market has simply gotten ahead of itself in a different way than 2000 — is the central question investors are sitting with right now.

Gobbles Gobble's Take: Stronger fundamentals than 2000 is a lower bar than it sounds — the answer to "is this a bubble?" rarely comes before the pop.

Source: r/investing


SanDisk and Micron: Is This AI Memory Boom Structurally Different, or Another Cycle in Disguise?

Memory chip investing has a well-worn pattern: surging demand drives up prices and margins, new supply floods in, prices collapse, shareholders absorb the damage. The question now circulating on r/stocks is whether AI-driven demand — specifically the kind that powers data centers and large language models — finally breaks that cycle for companies like SanDisk (SNDK) and Micron (MU).

The bull case, as laid out in a recent r/stocks thread, centers on structural demand: hyperscaler capital expenditure remains elevated, AI workloads require substantial memory and storage, and earnings and margins for these companies have been improving. One commenter noted that past upcycles were driven by consumer device shifts — smartphones, tablets, DDR2 upgrades — or supply disruptions like the SK Hynix fab fire that removed roughly 15% of available supply. The 2016–2018 data center cycle was the closest precedent, but it predated the current AI arms race. The counter-argument: "memory is still memory." When pricing gets strong enough, supply eventually responds, and the market historically swings from scarcity to oversupply faster than investors expect.

Micron's forward P/E is also drawing discussion. As one commenter explained, the market is applying a cyclical discount — pricing in the likelihood that current margins reflect a shortage premium that won't last, with consensus models reportedly forecasting a normalization in memory pricing in 2026–27. Cycle stocks, the logic goes, always look cheap at the top because forward earnings haven't yet reflected the coming downturn.

Gobbles Gobble's Take: "Structural demand" and "memory cycle" have coexisted before — the debate isn't whether the cycle disappeared, it's whether AI stretches the upcycle long enough to matter for your time horizon.

Sources: r/stocks · r/stocks


Quick Hits

  • Dutch Bros beats Q1 2026 forecasts, stock dips anyway: The drive-thru coffee chain reported earnings above analyst expectations for Q1 2026, but shares fell following the announcement — a reminder that beating estimates doesn't guarantee a positive price reaction when expectations or guidance disappoint. Investing.com
  • Kinetik Holdings (KNTK) shares fall 4%: Yahoo Finance flagged the recent pullback in the energy infrastructure company, raising the question of whether it represents a reassessment of the stock's outlook or a short-term dip in an otherwise intact thesis. Yahoo Finance

In Case You Missed It

Yesterday's top stories:

Was this briefing useful?

One tap helps Gobbles learn what to cover more carefully.

Get Stock Alerts in your inbox

Free daily briefing. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

See something wrong? Report an inaccuracy