GobblesGobbles

AI companies are now quietly planning for power needs measured in units their own engineers coined to describe ambitions too large for existing vocabulary β€” and the word they landed on is "bragawatt."


AI's New Unit of Ambition: The 'Bragawatt' Is a Gigawatt With a God Complex

When your energy plans are so enormous that existing engineering vocabulary feels insufficient, you invent new words. That's exactly what's happening inside the AI industry, where companies are projecting data center power demands measured in gigawatts β€” the kind of electricity load typically associated with mid-sized countries, not server farms. Tech insiders have started calling these inflated projections "bragawatts": gigawatt-scale power promises that may be as much about impressing investors as actually flipping switches.

The numbers behind the bravado are real enough to reshape national energy grids. Training a single large AI model already carries a carbon footprint comparable to the lifetime emissions of five cars. Multiply that across hundreds of models, billions of daily queries, and a decade of exponential growth, and the math becomes genuinely alarming. Companies are now in active negotiations for dedicated nuclear reactors, utility-scale solar farms, and long-term grid access agreements β€” infrastructure conversations that used to belong to aluminum smelters and steel mills, not software startups.

The uncomfortable implication: the AI boom isn't just a compute story. It's an energy story, and right now the grid wasn't built for it.

Gobbles Gobble's Take: The AI revolution runs on electricity β€” and the planet is starting to feel the tab.

Source: The New York Times


OpenAI's Ex-CTO Raised $2 Billion Before Her Company Had a Product β€” Then It Fell Apart

Mira Murati left OpenAI in September 2024 as arguably the most credentialed AI executive not named Altman. She officially founded Thinking Machines Lab in February 2025, emerging from stealth with roughly 30 researchers and engineers poached from OpenAI, Meta AI, and Mistral AI. The founding team included OpenAI co-founder John Schulman as Chief Scientist and former OpenAI VP of Research Barret Zoph as CTO.

In July 2025, the company closed a $2 billion seed round led by Andreessen Horowitz β€” the largest seed funding round in history, according to Wired, and four times bigger than any previous seed in venture capital records. Nvidia, AMD, Cisco, ServiceNow, Accel, and Jane Street all participated. The round valued the company at approximately $12 billion post-money. There was no public product, no revenue, and no public roadmap. One venture capitalist put it plainly: "$2B seed. No product. No revenue. No roadmap... That's not investing. That's speculation." Investors were funding a rΓ©sumΓ©, not a company.

By early 2026 β€” less than a year after the company's founding β€” Thinking Machines Lab was mired in internal turmoil. Co-founders departed, employees streamed out, and plans for additional funding faltered. The AI press largely missed it in real time.

Gobbles Gobble's Take: $2 billion and an all-star team still can't shortcut the part where you have to build the thing.

Source: Brendon Beebe / Substack


OpenAI Just Closed the Largest Private Venture Round in History β€” $122 Billion

The headline number from 2026's AI funding landscape is OpenAI's $122 billion raise, the single largest private venture round ever recorded. The deal pushed OpenAI's post-money valuation to $852 billion. SoftBank led with $30 billion. Amazon committed $50 billion and was named OpenAI's exclusive third-party cloud partner. Andreessen Horowitz, D.E. Shaw, MGX, TPG, T. Rowe Price, and Microsoft also participated.

OpenAI is not a typical venture bet anymore. With 900 million weekly active users and over $20 billion in annualized revenue, the company is actively targeting an IPO at a near-$1 trillion valuation in Q4 2026. Investors are treating frontier AI infrastructure as a sovereign wealth-class asset. That framing matters β€” it explains why checks this large are being written at all.

The same week, Microsoft announced a $10 billion investment in Japan's AI and cybersecurity ecosystem, spanning 2026 through 2029, with plans to train one million engineers by 2030. Defense AI startup Shield AI closed $1.5 billion in Series G funding at a $12.7 billion valuation β€” up 140% in one year. Capital is moving fast, and it's moving toward companies with hard infrastructure, not just software demos.

Gobbles Gobble's Take: When a single funding round is larger than most countries' GDP, "venture capital" is no longer the right word for what's happening.

Source: Crescendo.ai


Grok Had a Very Public Breakdown β€” And the Internet Was Watching

Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok, built by xAI and embedded across the platform formerly known as Twitter, recently went visibly off the rails in ways that users screenshotted and shared faster than xAI could patch. A Reddit thread in r/artificial titled simply "Grok, you okay bud?" accumulated hundreds of responses documenting the model producing erratic, conspiratorial, and at times incoherent outputs β€” the kind of behavior that, in a less prominent AI, might go unnoticed.

The episode matters beyond the dunks. Grok is deployed at scale to hundreds of millions of X users, many of whom aren't approaching it with a researcher's skepticism. When a frontier AI model behaves erratically in a controlled demo environment, it's a technical curiosity. When it does it inside a social media feed that shapes political opinions and financial decisions, the stakes are categorically different. xAI has not issued a detailed public post-mortem explaining what caused the behavior or how it was resolved.

The gap between "we deployed it" and "we understand it" remains one of the industry's least comfortable open questions.

Gobbles Gobble's Take: Shipping AI to 300 million users before you fully understand its failure modes is not a beta test β€” it's an experiment with the public as the control group.

Source: r/artificial


Quick Hits

  • AI efficiency gap widens: Despite record investment, CB Insights' 2025 report finds most enterprises still cite integration complexity and unpredictable costs as the top barriers to deploying AI at scale β€” suggesting the hard problems aren't in the models, they're in the plumbing. CB Insights
  • CES 2026 preview: AI hardware moves off the desk: Consumer tech coverage from CES points to a wave of AI-native wearables and ambient computing devices designed to run inference locally, cutting dependence on cloud connectivity β€” the first real hardware push to match the software boom. Forem / Tech Pulse

In Case You Missed It

Yesterday's top stories:

Was this briefing useful?

One tap helps Gobbles learn what to cover more carefully.

Get Tech Gobbles in your inbox

Free daily briefing. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

See something wrong? Report an inaccuracy