GobblesGobbles

Live Q&A with Mike McKinsey

Mark your calendars: Tuesday, July 14, at 5:00 pm PST, Jesse and Eliot host a live Zoom event with near-death experiencer Mike McKinsey. The first half is a guided discussion of Mike's NDEs. The second half opens to general discussion and audience Q&A. All subscribers can attend live; recordings go to paid subscribers only. RSVP is required.

Gobbles Gobble's Take: A live Q&A is where private wonder has to stay interesting under fluorescent lights. Usually it does. Source: Coming Home Channel


The same story, told from everywhere

Victor Swift has built a research database drawing on the film series behind What They Saw โ€” described as "a comparative analysis of Near Death Experience stories revealing shared elements and messages." The site organizes what NDE-ers report into four themes: elements, messages, inspiration, and voices. The pattern that keeps emerging: overlapping similarities across age, time period, and geographic location.

Gobbles Gobble's Take: When the same motifs surface from different lives across different centuries, coincidence starts feeling like a bad explanation. Source: Coming Home Channel


If consciousness survives, whose argument wins?

Philosophy professor J.P. Andrew of the University of Colorado Boulder has a sharp answer. In a new essay, he argues that if any NDE reports involve genuine experiences of continued consciousness beyond bodily death, they provide strong evidence favoring theism over atheism. The logic: continued personal existence beyond death is considerably more expected on theism than on atheism.

Gobbles Gobble's Take: One empirical crack in the wall and the whole philosophical scoreboard shifts. Andrew is simply pointing at the crack. Source: Coming Home Channel


In Case You Missed It

Yesterday's top stories:

Was this briefing useful?

One tap helps Gobbles learn what to cover more carefully.

Get Exploring the Afterlife in your inbox

Free daily briefing. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

See something wrong? Report an inaccuracy